Summary of Proposal
To create a standardized naming system for proposals that pass their temperature check.
After a proposal passes the ‘temperature check’, that is, the non-token vote done here on Discourse, or there was substantial discussion within the DAO, it is assigned a ‘DIP’ (DAO Improvement Proposal).
For consideration, we suggest a simple convention of:
DIP-1, DIP-2, and so forth.
Example: [DIP-3] Quorum Proposal
Also, along with the naming convention, we’ll implement the DIP (DAO Improvement Proposal) category here on the forum. Each proposal assigned a DIP will be moved to that category for easy lookup and to separate substantial changes from minor discussions.
Motivation for Proposing
As the DAO matures, it deserves a more structured approach to its discussion of proposals. Therefore we believe we can take a very basic yet high-value step to implement a naming convention.
Reasons supporting the proposal
- Low-effort implementation
- Each proposal will have a clear reference
Reasons against the proposal
- You dislike structure
- Yes to [DIP-0]
- No to [DIP-0]