This is a bold move! Congrats to everyone for putting this together. 
With [DIP-35] - Amendment of the [DIP-28] budget also on the forum, I wonder why the promotion services are presented in this proposal, and why they aren’t part of the cost breakdown?
Does this mean the promotion services are a “bonus” on top of the development grant, and SSV Labs might cover them for the DAO, so the requested grant does cover that?
Checking the [DIP-26] ssv.network DAO Four-Year Budget (2024-2028), the requested amount is above the allocation, but would fit the budget + buffer if promotion services were included.
I’d love to hear more about it.
Thank you!
—Ben