SSV Staking - Request for Comment

This is not a DAO proposal; it’s the result of research and community feedback intended to initiate a community discussion by SSV.labs.

1. Background: Unprecedented Growth

Over the past year, the SSV Network has grown at an unprecedented pace — reaching over 5 million ETH staked, making it the second largest validator infrastructure network globally, currently operating ~14% of staked ETH. With major integrations coming, SSV could reach 8–10 million ETH in 2026.

This growth underscores SSV’s success as the backbone for Ethereum validator distribution and resilience. However, despite the rapid expansion in staked ETH and network’s potential, the SSV token has become detached from both the network’s growth and the broader ETH market.

This paper proposes a staking model designed to reconnect the SSV token to its underlying fundamentals and position SSV as an ETH Accrual Token for the wider Ethereum community.


2. Current State: Fee Structure

At present, the SSV protocol charges a 1% network fee on validator rewards, denominated in SSV tokens.
By contrast, the Incentivized Mainnet (IM) program gives a higher rate of 5%, also in SSV.

Effective Balance (ETH) Tier APR Boost
3,200,032 – 4,000,000 7.50%
4,000,032 – 4,800,000 6.00%
4,800,032 – 5,600,000 5.00%
5,600,032 – 6,400,000 4.25%
6,400,032 – 7,200,000 3.50%
7,200,032 – 8,000,000 3.00%
8,000,032 – 9,600,000 2.50%

While this SSV-based rewards system initially served as a growth catalyst, it introduced volatility for operators, as SSV’s price fluctuates independently of ETH. Moreover, because SSV fees are paid in a token not directly linked to validator rewards (which is in ETH), the network’s economic flywheel remains partially disconnected.


3. Realigning Network Economics

The post aims to explore realigning network economics to its growth by suggesting 3 changes for the ssv.network DAO to consider:

(1) Enable Network Fees denominated in ETH

Enabling network fees to be denominated and paid in ETH, the native asset of the validator ecosystem.
This ensures:

  • Predictable fees for operators (no SSV/ETH conversion risk)
  • Direct linkage between protocol growth and validator sustainability
  • Stable, transparent pricing for institutions integrating SSV

(2) Gradual Fee Increase to 1.5% of ETH Rewards

The base fee should be steadily raised (until EOY 2026) from 1% to 1.5% of validator ETH rewards
This phased increase allows:

  • Smoother market adaptation
  • Ongoing accumulation of ETH-denominated revenue
  • Predictable commitment from stakers and token holders


Based on 10M staked SSV, ETH APR 2.9%

(3) SSV Staking

SSV holders will be able to lock their tokens in a dedicated contract. These tokens will serve as a backstop for any potential protocol failures in the future, as determined by the DAO. In return for participating in the backstop pool, they will receive 100% of the ETH collected from network fees.

The new SSV staking mechanism introduces a dual purpose for the token:

  1. ETH Funneling/Utilization — All ETH collected via network fees will be distributed to SSV stakers, proportionally to their stake. This effectively turns stakers into ETH rewards participants based on protocol activity.
  2. Network Security Backstop — Staked SSV acts as a first-responder pool in the event of any protocol-level failure (though unlikely), covering damages or slashing-related events.

This dual design creates a direct link between:

  • ETH rewards growth (from validators and TVL expansion), and
  • SSV token utilization and staking participation.


Based on SSV at $35 (previous high EOY 24’)

For more information and simulations on potential ETH APR please visit https://ethaccrualtoken.com/


5. Economic Objectives

The updated fees and staking system aims to:

  • Re-align incentives
    across all network participants
    Validators, operators, and token holders now share exposure to ETH-denominated growth.
  • Create structural utilization for SSV
    Users must acquire and stake SSV to earn ETH rewards and secure the network.
  • Re-couple SSV token fundamentals to network adoption
    Token fundamentals will now scale with total ETH staked and validator performance, re-establishing a clear, rational link between SSV, network activity, and the broader Ethereum economy.
  • Reduce volatility and friction
    By eliminating SSV-denominated fees and introducing ETH-based rewards, the protocol becomes more predictable and institution-friendly.

6. Conclusion

By transitioning to ETH-based fees and introducing SSV staking as a sustainability and security mechanism, the SSV Network can evolve into a fully self-sustaining, fundamentals driven infrastructure protocol.

This model aligns the interests of all participants — operators, validators, and token holders — while ensuring that SSV’s token value is firmly coupled to ETH rewards, total staked TVL, and overall network health.

3 Likes

The reliability of SSV’s DVT technology has been proven by the market, ensuring the safe and stable operation of over 100,000 validators!

This solution undoubtedly advances the SSV economic model and promotes the sustainable development of the SSV token. We hope this solution will reach mainnet soon!

This is a solid and forward-looking proposal that addresses an important issue — the disconnection between SSV’s network growth and token fundamentals. The idea of shifting to ETH-denominated fees and introducing SSV staking as an ETH accrual layer makes a lot of sense for aligning incentives and enhancing sustainability.

However, a few aspects deserve deeper discussion:

Staking risk/reward balance: It will be important to define how the backstop mechanism is managed transparently and whether DAO governance will set clear parameters for risk coverage and compensation in case of slashing or failures.

ETH → SSV flow dynamics: Long-term sustainability depends on ensuring that distributing ETH rewards to SSV stakers does not reduce demand for SSV itself. Introducing mechanisms like periodic SSV buybacks or enhanced governance utility could help reinforce token value.

Validator fee competitiveness: The proposed 1%–1.5% network fee (in ETH) might be relatively high compared to current validator commission structures. In practice, this could represent over 10% of typical validator commissions, which may be difficult to justify without demonstrating clear performance, reliability, and institutional benefits over competing infrastructure.

1 Like

For an extra upward market force, maybe add an “auto-compounding” option to SSV staking that takes the ETH income and buys SSV from the market for the user, increasing their SSV staked.

2 Likes

Great post.

What does the table 2 line 2 starting with 75% represent? I do not know what 75% means. Is it 75% of all Staked SSV?

Does staking have to act as a network security backstop? I don’t think its necessary to add and it could be an impediment to users wanting to stake. Scenario outlines of what happens when the backstop is activated would help explain the real risk here.

I hold that the new ETH fees going to buy SSV and then burning the SSV automatically is a better modal.

Let’s get this type of proposal moving to voting now that it has been under discussion for months across various posts/platforms.

1 Like

That table shows the SSV staking APR depending on network fee and % of all SSV staked

Are node operators also paid in ETH? Or in SSV? From a validator’s perspective, will they need to pay for their SSV validator in a single token (ETH?)

I’m thinking about this on a cluster level — meaning that a cluster will either be fully in SSV or fully in ETH.

In an ETH-based cluster, both the network fees and operator fees would be paid in ETH.

Regarding supported ETH-equivalent tokens, I think SSV should create its own ETH token and maintain a whitelist of other tokens that can mint that token (including ETH itself).
This approach would provide a single ERC-20 token for paying fees, while still maintaining flexibility across different use cases and ecosystems utilizing SSV.

1 Like

Its own ETH staking token?

Well, not a staking token per se — think of it more as a wrapper token for a bunch of other tokens to make accounting more streamlined.

A token that is composed of ETH + other ETH staking tokens that is used to pay SSV network fees with a function that enables auto-conversion from ETH and any other ETH staking tokens in order to get it?

1 Like

Yes, makes supporting many tokens for fee easier

I like the idea, it still requires a significant amount of investment from a tech and education perspective than just having them pay in ETH right off the top of staking reward. Its simple, both conceptually and implementation wise.

My opinion is pay fee in plain old ETH now, build out a Composition ETH token down the line.

Seperately, Maple is likely switching from stake and earn to buy and treasury because stake and earn was deemed less efficient: https://snapshot.box/#/s:maple.eth/proposal/0x8151eb49b56770b882e8d9b6affd4a698572fc6eec31001c74bd977f61c84374

1 Like