# \[TEMP CHECK\] Revisiting the Operator Marketplace and Fee Models

**URL:** <https://forum.ssv.network/t/temp-check-revisiting-the-operator-marketplace-and-fee-models/1963>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Created:** [July 8, 2025, 1:38am UTC](https://forum.ssv.network/t/temp-check-revisiting-the-operator-marketplace-and-fee-models/1963 "2025-07-08T01:38:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BumpyTale](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.ssv.network/bumpytale/32/567_2.png) [@BumpyTale](https://forum.ssv.network/u/BumpyTale)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2025, 6:33pm UTC](https://forum.ssv.network/t/temp-check-revisiting-the-operator-marketplace-and-fee-models/1963/27 "2025-09-16T18:33:26Z")

</div>

I think a clarification is needed here:

Resharing changes the shares, not the secret. In SSV’s DKG, resharing regenerates new shares of the same validator key. If ≥ t former operators kept their old shares, they can still reconstruct the key. “Old shares are thrown away” is an operational assumption, not a cryptographic guarantee. To fully revoke past operators you’d need a key rotation (new validator).

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.ssv.network/t/temp-check-revisiting-the-operator-marketplace-and-fee-models/1963)._