Discussion on the voting threshold of 100 SSV Tokens. Is It Optimal?

Hey kbc, thanks for responding to my first post here! Loved the great charts with data. :smiley:

Voting apathy among small token holders at SSV could decrease as the network evolves. For example, initiatives like jFactory’s new staking pool, funded by an SSV Network grant, plan to expand into cross-chain operations and multiple Proof of Stake blockchains. This could open up more opportunities for small token holders, boosting both their financial incentives and their emotional investment in the network’s governance.

The chart “SSV Holders - groups” shows that 69.6% of SSV holders can’t vote unless they delegate. This high percentage makes a strong case for rethinking the voting threshold.

Once again, the second chart “SSV Holders - days holding” visually underscores that the 100 SSV token voting threshold might exclude a significant number of stakeholders from the governance process.

P.S. I was wondering if you had a chance to vote on the poll in my post? :signal_strength:

2 Likes